English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 17938/22957 (78%)
Visitors : 7393850      Online Users : 235
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.csmu.edu.tw:8080/ir/handle/310902500/24820


    Title: Relative risk of end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis in treated ankylosing spondylitis patients compared with individuals without ankylosing spondylitis: A nationwide, population-based, matched-cohort study
    Authors: Chen, HH;Lin, CH;Lai, KL;Hsieh, TY;Chen, YM;Tseng, CW;Gotcher, DF;Chang, YM;Chiou, CC;Liu, SC;Weng, SJ
    Date: 2020
    Issue Date: 2022-08-09T08:08:31Z (UTC)
    Publisher: PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
    ISSN: 1932-6203
    Abstract: Objective To examine the relative risk of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring dialysis among treated ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients compared with non-AS individuals. Methods We used claims data from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database obtained between 2003 and 2012, and enrolled 37,070 newly treated AS patients and randomly selected 370,700 non-AS individuals matched (1:10) for age, sex and year of index date. Those with a history of chronic renal failure or dialysis were excluded. After adjusting for age, sex, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, IgA nephropathy, frequency of serum creatinine examinations, use of methotrexate, sulfasalazine, ciclosporis, corticosteroid, aminoglycoside, amphotericin B, cisplatin, contrast agents and annual cumulative defined daily dose (cDDD) of traditional NSAIDs, selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors (COX-2i) and preferential COX-2i, we calculated the adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) with 95% confidence intervals using the Cox proportional hazard model to quantify the risk of ESRD in AS patients. We re-selected 6621 AS patients and 6621 non-AS subjects by further matching (1:1) for cDDDs of three groups of NSAIDs to re-estimate the aHRs for ESRD. Results Fifty-one (0.14%) of the 37,070 AS patients and 1417 (0.38%) of the non-AS individuals developed ESRD after a follow-up of 158,846 and 1,707,757 person-years, respectively. The aHR for ESRD was 0.59 (0.42-0.81) in AS patients compared with non-AS individuals. However, after further matching for cDDD of NSAIDs, the aHR of ESRD was 1.02 (0.412.53). Significant risk factors included hypertension, IgA nephropathy and use of COX-2i. Conclusions The risk of ESRD was not significantly different between treated AS patients and non-AS individuals matched for age, sex, year of index date and dose of NSAID.
    URI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231458
    https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000536019800016
    https://ir.csmu.edu.tw:8080/handle/310902500/24820
    Relation: PLOS ONE ,2020 ,v15 ,issue 4
    Appears in Collections:[中山醫學大學研究成果] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML183View/Open


    SFX Query

    All items in CSMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback