| Abstract: | 本研究目的為探討大學生的依附型態與分手後的復原成長結果，並以多重戀情或一般戀情作為調節變項，以了解依附關係與多重戀情或一般戀情在分手後的復原結果上，彼此之間是否有交互作用。本研究採橫斷性調查研究，以方便取樣的方式，於台灣的北部、中部、南部、東部、離島各地招募曾有分手經驗的大學生作為研究對象，以結構式問卷為研究工具，包含個人基本資料、依附關係量表與分手復原量表，共得有效樣本469份。本研究以敘述統計、單因子變異數分析與二因子變異數分析等統計方法進行資料分析，得到以下結果：
(1)不同的背景變項不會影響分手後的復原結果，包括性別、目前有無交往對象、目前交往對象維持時間、過去總交往次數、是否曾發生多重戀情、多重戀情經驗次數、多重戀情發生方式、多重戀情維持時間、多重戀情發生原因。
(2)安全依附越高的人，分手復原的結果越好，而焦慮依附的高低與逃避依附的高低在分手復原結果上則沒有顯著差異。
(3)安全依附的高低與多重戀情或一般戀情在分手復原結果的交互作用上有達到顯著效果，其中在一般戀情時，安全依附越高的人，分手復原結果越好，但在多重戀情時，安全依附的高低與分手復原結果則沒有顯著差異。
本研究結果發現多重戀情者與一般戀情者的分手復原結果並無顯著差異，但在一般戀情中安全依附越高的人，分手復原結果越好，而多重戀情的分手復原結果則未與焦慮依附、逃避依附達到交互作用。此外，焦慮依附及逃避依附對復原結果的影響並不會受到多重戀情或一般戀情的調節。
The purpose of this study is to understand the attachment patterns of university students and the recovery and growth after breakup, using extradyadic love or general love as moderator variable. Is there any interaction between attachment and extradyadic love or general love on the recovery results after breakup? In this study, a cross-sectional survey was used, and 469 university students who had breakup experience were recruited from northern, central, southern, eastern, and outlying islands of Taiwan by convenience sampling. The structured questionnaire was used as a research tool, including basic personal information, experience in close relationships scale, and the breakup recovery scale. The data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, One-way ANOVA and Two-way ANOVA, and the results were showed as follows:
(1) Different background variables will not affect the recovery results after breakup, including gender, still single or in another relationship now, the time that current relationship contain, the total number of past relationships, have ever experienced extradyadic love or not, the total number of past extradyadic love that had experienced, the way that past extradyadic love happened, the time that past extradyadic love contained, the reason that past extradyadic love happened.
(2) People who are high security attachment, have the better recovery after breakup , but whether high or low anxiety attachment and avoident attachment do not matter in breakup recovery results.
(3) Safety attachment and extradyadic love or general love were with interactions on the recovery result after breaking up. In the general love, people who are high safety attachment have better recovery results after breakup. But safety attachment doesn’t matter in the recovery of extradyadic love.
The results of this study found that there is no significant difference in the breakup recovery results of extradyadic lovers or general lovers, but people who are high safety attachment in general love, have the better recovery results after breakup. In the other way, the extradyadic love and anxiety or avoidant attachment were not with interactions on the recovery result after breaking up. Furthermore, the effects of anxious attachment and avoidant attachment on recovery results will not be moderate by extradyadic love or general love. |
