English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 17918/22933 (78%)
Visitors : 7416793      Online Users : 43
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    CSMUIR > Medical College > Institute of Medicine > Journal paper >  Item 310902500/18558
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.csmu.edu.tw:8080/ir/handle/310902500/18558


    Title: Diagnostic performance of serum cystatin C and serum creatinine in the prediction of chronic kidney disease in renal transplant recipients
    Authors: JP, Tsai
    SW, Wu
    TW, Hung
    WT, Kao
    CL, Hong
    JD, Lian
    HR, Chang
    Contributors: 中山醫大
    Date: 2010-12
    Issue Date: 2017-11-14T07:58:25Z (UTC)
    ISSN: 0041-1345
    Abstract: BACKGROUND:
    Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has adverse impacts on mortality and morbidity of renal transplant recipients. Serum cystatin C (sCysC) is a novel marker in predicting the CKD. We therefore compare sCysC and serum creatinine (sCr) with the aim of improving the detection of CKD in renal transplant recipients.
    METHODS:
    We enrolled 106 renal transplant recipients and estimated glomerular filtration rates (GFR) using the Cockcroft-Gault (GFR(CG)) and the abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (GFR(aMDRD)) formulae. We defined CKD as the presence of structural or functional kidney damage, irrespective of the diagnosis. Comparisons of sCysC and sCr in detecting CKD were analyzed.
    RESULTS:
    sCysC correlates with sCr significantly (r = 0.87; P < .001). The receiver operating characteristic curve demonstrates that sCysC has a better specificity and area under the curve, but less sensitivity than sCr in predicting CKD in renal transplant recipients if GFR is estimated by GFR(CG). Additionally, if GFR was estimated by GFR(aMDRD), the role of sCysC or sCr in prediction of CKD was comparable.
    CONCLUSION:
    sCysC may be better than sCr to detect CKD in renal transplant recipients using the GFR(CG).
    URI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.09.150
    https://ir.csmu.edu.tw:8080/ir/handle/310902500/18558
    Relation: Transplant Proc. 2010 Dec;42(10):4530-3.
    Appears in Collections:[Institute of Medicine] Journal paper

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML270View/Open


    SFX Query

    All items in CSMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback