English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 17918/22933 (78%)
Visitors : 7407448      Online Users : 130
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.csmu.edu.tw:8080/ir/handle/310902500/10495


    Title: The comparison of cetirizine, levocetirizine and placebo for the treatment of childhood perennial allergic rhinitis.
    Authors: Lee CF
    Sun HL
    Lu KH
    Ku MS
    Lue KH
    Contributors: 中山醫學大學
    Keywords: allergic rhinitis;cetirizine;levocetirizine;histamine H1-receptor antagonist
    Date: 2009-08
    Issue Date: 2015-03-18T04:43:42Z (UTC)
    ISSN: 0905-6157
    Abstract: Cetirizine (Zyrtec) is a potent and long-acting second-generation histamine H1- receptor antagonist for the treatment of allergic disease, such as allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria, in adult and child. It is a racemic mixture of levocetirizine (Xyzal) and dextrocetirizine. The purpose of this present study was to compare the efficacy of cetirizine, levocetirizine and placebo for the treatment of pediatric perennial allergic rhinitis. 74 perennial allergic rhinitis patients, aged 6 to 12 years old, assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups for 12 weeks randomly. The effects of the three agents were compared with the Pediatric Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (PRQLQ) and Total Symptom Score (TSS) by diary. Nasal peak expiratory flow rate (nPEFR) and laboratory examinations including serum immunoglobulin E level, eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), blood eosinophil counts and eosinophil percentage in a nasal smear were evaluated among the three groups. The results revealed that both cetirizine and levocetirizine improved TSS in comparison with the placebo group, and ceterizine appeared to be more efficacious than levocetirizine at week 8 and week 12. The PRQLQ score showed significant decreased both in cetirizine and levocetirizine group, but there was no statistic significant difference between both groups. The eosinophil proportion in a nasal smear significantly decreased among the cetirizine in comparison with the placebo group but there was no statistic significant in levocetirizine groups. Both cetirizine and levocetirizine showed significant improvement in nPEFR in comparison with the placebo group, and ceterizine appeared to be more efficacious than levocetirizine. The 12-week treatment program showed that cetirizine was more effectious than levocetirizine.
    URI: https://ir.csmu.edu.tw:8080/ir/handle/310902500/10495
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3038.2008.00816.x
    Relation: Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2009 Aug;20(5):493-9
    Appears in Collections:[醫學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML503View/Open


    SFX Query

    All items in CSMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback