English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 17928/22944 (78%)
Visitors : 7416286      Online Users : 297
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.csmu.edu.tw:8080/ir/handle/310902500/6899


    Title: 台灣居家治療精神分裂症患者治療方式與再住院風險分析
    Therapeutic Strategy and Risk for Re-hospitalization among Patients with Schizophrenia in the Home Care Program in Taiwan
    Authors: 朱柏全
    Ju, Po-Chung
    Contributors: 中山醫學大學:醫學研究所;賴德仁
    Keywords: 居家治療;邏輯迴歸;長效針劑;理思必妥;精神分裂症
    home carel;logistic regression;long-acting injection;risperidone;schizophrenia
    Date: 2013
    Issue Date: 2013-12-23T03:31:03Z (UTC)
    Abstract: 本研究的目的是評估精神分裂症患者在居家照護治療中,其用藥策略和治療效果之間的關係。
    從全民健康保險研究資料庫取西元2004年至2009年ICD-9-CM診斷碼為295住院之個案為研究對象。研究對象為精神科出院後加入居家照護計畫且給予長效針劑,包含理思必妥長效針劑及傳統長效針劑(定義為長效針劑組)或口服抗精神病藥(定義為口服藥物組)的病人,來比較兩組用藥策略不同對再住院率的影響。
    此研究的最終樣本數包含長效針劑組的810位個案及口服藥物組的945位個案。在控制病人、醫院特性及傾向分數後,本研究採取邏輯回歸統計方法,檢測在12個月的觀察期中,病患採取長效針劑治療對再住院風險的影響與使用口服抗精神病藥物有無差異。結果發現長效針劑組比口服藥物組在再住院風險的勝算比,校正前為0.80(信賴區間[CI],0.65-0.98)。校正過後的勝算比下降至0.78(信賴區間[CI], 0.63-0.97)。校正傾向分數後,統計結果維持不變。顯示在居家照護治療中,使用長效針劑治療的病人,與使用口服抗精神病藥物相比可顯著降低精神科再住院率。
    因此,在居家治療使用長效針劑,不論理思必妥長效針劑或傳統長效針劑,皆能降低病患再住院的機會與預防精神分裂症的復發,可為臨床及經濟帶來很大的助益。
    We aimed at evaluating the relationship between medication and treatment effectiveness in a home-care setting among patients with schizophrenia.
    Patients with schizophrenia hospitalized between 2004 and 2009 with a primary International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code of 295, were identified from Psychiatric Inpatient Medical Claims Data released by the National Health Research Institute in Taiwan. Patients who joined the home-care program after discharge and were prescribed long-acting injections (LAI), including risperidone long-acting injections and conventional long-acting injections (the LAI group) or oral antipsychotic medications (the oral group) were included as study subjects.
    The final sample for the study included 810 participants in the LAI group and 945 in the oral group. Logistic regression was performed to examine the independent effect of LAI medication on the risk for re-hospitalization within the 12-month observation window after controlling for patient and hospital characteristics and propensity score (PS) quintile adjustment. The unadjusted odds ratio (OR) for re-hospitalization risk was 0.80 (confidence interval [CI], 0.65-0.98) for the LAI group compared to the oral group. The adjusted OR was further reduced to 0.78 (CI, 0.63-0.97). Results remained unchanged when the PS quintiles were entered into the regression for further adjustment. In a home-care setting, patients treated with long-acting antipsychotic agents are at a significantly lower risk for psychiatric re-hospitalization than those treated with oral medication.
    Consequently, LAI home-based treatment for the prevention of schizophrenia relapse may lead to substantial clinical and economic benefits.
    URI: https://ir.csmu.edu.tw:8080/ir/handle/310902500/6899
    Appears in Collections:[醫學研究所] 博碩士論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML317View/Open


    SFX Query

    All items in CSMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback