中山醫學大學機構典藏 CSMUIR:Item 310902500/24809
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 17918/22933 (78%)
造訪人次 : 7429916      線上人數 : 55
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://ir.csmu.edu.tw:8080/ir/handle/310902500/24809


    題名: A comparison of test-retest reliability and random measurement error of the Barthel Index and modified Barthel Index in patients with chronic stroke
    作者: Yang, CM;Wang, YC;Lee, CH;Chen, MH;Hsieh, CL
    關鍵詞: Barthel Index;modified Barthel Index;activities of daily living;stroke;test-retest reliability;random measurement error
    日期: 2022
    上傳時間: 2022-08-09T08:08:20Z (UTC)
    出版者: TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
    ISSN: 0963-8288
    摘要: Objective To compare the test-retest reliability and random measurement errors of the Barthel Index (BI) and modified Barthel Index (MBI) in patients with chronic stroke. Method The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the minimal detectable change (MDC) were applied respectively to examine the test-retest reliability (about 2 weeks apart) and the random measurement errors. The MDC% was used to adjust the cut-off score for determining whether a real change had been achieved, if heteroscedasticity existed. Results A total of 60 patients participated. The BI and MBI both had high ICCs (0.94 and 0.94, respectively) with small MDCs (16.2 and 15.4, respectively) and MDC%s (21.2% and 19.0%, respectively), indicating that both measures have comparable reliability in repeated assessments. However, moderate associations (r= -0.47 for the BI and -0.59 for the MBI) were found between the means of tests and retests and the absolute values of change scores, indicating heteroscedasticity. These findings suggest that a fixed MDC value is not appropriate for determining the real change in both measures because the amount of random measurement error varies with the patients' ADL function. Conclusion The MBI, which showed excellent test-retest reliability and relatively lower random measurement error than the BI, appears to be a better ADL measure. The MDC% adjusted value is recommended to determine whether the change scores are beyond random measurement error.
    URI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1814429
    https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000567617700001
    https://ir.csmu.edu.tw:8080/handle/310902500/24809
    關聯: DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION ,2022 ,v44 ,issue 10 ,p2099-2103
    顯示於類別:[中山醫學大學研究成果] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML179檢視/開啟


    SFX Query

    在CSMUIR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

    TAIR相關文章

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋