中山醫學大學機構典藏 CSMUIR:Item 310902500/24809
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 17939/22958 (78%)
造访人次 : 7366310      在线人数 : 311
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://ir.csmu.edu.tw:8080/ir/handle/310902500/24809


    题名: A comparison of test-retest reliability and random measurement error of the Barthel Index and modified Barthel Index in patients with chronic stroke
    作者: Yang, CM;Wang, YC;Lee, CH;Chen, MH;Hsieh, CL
    关键词: Barthel Index;modified Barthel Index;activities of daily living;stroke;test-retest reliability;random measurement error
    日期: 2022
    上传时间: 2022-08-09T08:08:20Z (UTC)
    出版者: TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
    ISSN: 0963-8288
    摘要: Objective To compare the test-retest reliability and random measurement errors of the Barthel Index (BI) and modified Barthel Index (MBI) in patients with chronic stroke. Method The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the minimal detectable change (MDC) were applied respectively to examine the test-retest reliability (about 2 weeks apart) and the random measurement errors. The MDC% was used to adjust the cut-off score for determining whether a real change had been achieved, if heteroscedasticity existed. Results A total of 60 patients participated. The BI and MBI both had high ICCs (0.94 and 0.94, respectively) with small MDCs (16.2 and 15.4, respectively) and MDC%s (21.2% and 19.0%, respectively), indicating that both measures have comparable reliability in repeated assessments. However, moderate associations (r= -0.47 for the BI and -0.59 for the MBI) were found between the means of tests and retests and the absolute values of change scores, indicating heteroscedasticity. These findings suggest that a fixed MDC value is not appropriate for determining the real change in both measures because the amount of random measurement error varies with the patients' ADL function. Conclusion The MBI, which showed excellent test-retest reliability and relatively lower random measurement error than the BI, appears to be a better ADL measure. The MDC% adjusted value is recommended to determine whether the change scores are beyond random measurement error.
    URI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1814429
    https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000567617700001
    https://ir.csmu.edu.tw:8080/handle/310902500/24809
    關聯: DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION ,2022 ,v44 ,issue 10 ,p2099-2103
    显示于类别:[中山醫學大學研究成果] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML176检视/开启


    SFX Query

    在CSMUIR中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

    TAIR相关文章

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈