English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 17938/22957 (78%)
Visitors : 7393662      Online Users : 170
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.csmu.edu.tw:8080/ir/handle/310902500/24654


    Title: Image-guided video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery with Artis Pheno for pulmonary nodule resection
    Authors: Cheng, YF;Chen, HC;Ke, PC;Hung, WH;Cheng, CY;Lin, CH;Wang, BY
    Keywords: Image-guided;video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS);Artis Pheno;pulmonary nodule;localization
    Date: 2020
    Issue Date: 2022-08-09T08:05:51Z (UTC)
    Publisher: AME PUBL CO
    ISSN: 2072-1439
    Abstract: Background: One challenging aspect of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is finding the small pulmonary lung nodules for resection. Pre-operative localization of nodules is important for resection. Recently, image-guided VATS (iVATS) in a hybrid room has received attention. Our study aims to compare pros and cons between traditional CT room localization and iVATS localization with Artis Pheno. Methods: This study was a retrospective analysis in our institute (Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua). Patients with pulmonary nodules who received localization between January 2018 and December 2018 were included in the study. There were 126 patients included in the study. Among these, 63 patients received localization in a CT room and the other 63 patients received iVATS. We measured the time from localization to skin incision, success rate, complication rate, operation time, blood loss and length of hospital stay. Results: Time from localization to skin incision was significantly shorter in the iVATS group than in the CT room group (23.57 vs. 372.11 min, P<0.001). The CT room group had a significantly higher complication rate than the iVATS group (n= 49, 77.8% vs. n=2, 3.2%, P<0.001). There were no significant differences in operation methods, operation time, blood loss and length of hospital stay. Conclusions: iVATS provides shorter time from localization to skin incision and fewer complications than CT room localization.
    URI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2020.02.12
    https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000530110200011
    https://ir.csmu.edu.tw:8080/handle/310902500/24654
    Relation: JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE ,2020 ,v12 ,issue 4 ,p1342-1349
    Appears in Collections:[中山醫學大學研究成果] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML163View/Open


    SFX Query

    All items in CSMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback