English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 17939/22958 (78%)
Visitors : 7365641      Online Users : 166
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.csmu.edu.tw:8080/ir/handle/310902500/24479


    Title: In vitro and in vivo osteogenesis of gelatin-modified calcium silicate cement with washout resistance
    Authors: Wu, IT;Kao, PF;Huang, YR;Ding, SJ
    Keywords: Bone cement;Calcium silicate;Calcium sulfate;Gelatin;Bone repair
    Date: 2020
    Issue Date: 2022-08-09T08:03:01Z (UTC)
    Publisher: ELSEVIER
    ISSN: 0928-4931
    Abstract: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the physicochemical properties and the in vitro and in vivo osteo- genesis of the newly developed calcium silicate containing 5 wt% gelatin (CSG) cement compared with calcium silicate (CS) and calcium sulfate hemihydrate (CSH) cements. In addition to the phase composition and microstructure, washout resistance, setting time, and diametral tensile strength of the bone cements were also performed. In vitro examination of cell growth, differentiation, and mineralization were performed with macrophage cell line (RAW 264.7), MG63 human osteoblast-like cells, and human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs). The mini-pig model with mandibular alveolar bone defect was used to assess the in vivo function of cement. Histological and histomorphometric assessments were performed at 6 and 12 weeks after implantation. The results indicated that the CS and CSG powders were mainly composed of poorly crystalline beta-dicalcium silicate, and the irregular CSH powders had a highly crystalline phase. After setting, the product of CS and CSG was calcium-silicate-hydrate gel and CSH exhibited a plate-like gypsum crystal structure. The setting time of CS, CSG, and CSH was 19, 35, and 10 min, respectively. Gelatin effectively improved the washout resistance and diametral tensile strength of CS from 2.4 MPa to 3.4 MPa, while CSH had no washout resistance and its strength was 7.6 MPa. The osteogenic activity of MG63 and hMSC cells on the CSG cement surface was consistently shown to be significantly higher than that on the CSH cement surface. Interestingly, CS and CSG cements exhibited lower macrophage expression compared to CSH cements. Twelve week after implantation, the amount of new bone in the defect area of the CS group was slightly higher than that of the CSG and CSH groups. It is concluded that CSG cement had improved anti-washout performance, favorable osteogenesis in vitro and in vivo, which was beneficial for clinical application.
    URI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.111297
    https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000573293900009
    https://ir.csmu.edu.tw:8080/handle/310902500/24479
    Relation: MATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING C-MATERIALS FOR BIOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS ,2020 ,v117
    Appears in Collections:[中山醫學大學研究成果] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML255View/Open


    SFX Query

    All items in CSMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback