English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 17939/22958 (78%)
Visitors : 7366375      Online Users : 109
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.csmu.edu.tw:8080/ir/handle/310902500/24448


    Title: Enhanced antibacterial activity of calcium silicate-based hybrid cements for bone repair
    Authors: Lin, MC;Chen, CC;Wu, IT;Ding, SJ
    Keywords: Calcium silicate;Bone cement;Chitosan;Anti-washout;Antibacterial activity
    Date: 2020
    Issue Date: 2022-08-09T08:02:29Z (UTC)
    Publisher: ELSEVIER
    ISSN: 0928-4931
    Abstract: Calcium silicate cement has attracted much attention for bone defect repair and regeneration due to its osteogenic properties. Biomaterial-associated infections and washout have become a common clinical problem. In order to enhance the antibacterial and washout performance of calcium silicate cement to meet clinical needs, different types of chitosan, including chitosan polysaccharide (CTS), quaternary ammonium chitosan (QTS), and chitosan oligosaccharide (COS), as a liquid phase were added to the calcium silicate powder. The physicochemical properties, in vitro bioactivity, antibacterial efficacy, and osteogenic effects (MG63 cells) of the cement were evaluated. Antibacterial activity was conducted with Gram-negative Escherichia coli (E. coli) and a Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) bacteria. The amount of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced in the bacteria cultured with the chitosan solution was also detected. The experimental results showed that the chitosan additive did not affect the crystalline phase of calcium silicate cement, but increased the setting time and strength of the cement in a concentration-dependent manner. Within the scope of this study, CTS and QTS solutions with a concentration of not < 1 wt% improved the washout resistance of the control cement, while the COS solutions failed to strengthen the cement. When soaked in simulated body fluid (SBF) for 1 day, all cement samples formed apatite spherules. As the soaking time increased, the diametral tensile strength of all cements decreased and the porosity increased. The assays of MG63 cell function showed lower osteogenic activity of osteoblastic cells grown on the surfaces of the chitosan-incorporated cements in comparison with the control cement without chitosan. At the same 1% concentration, compared with QTS and COS cement, CTS cement had lower cell attachment, proliferation, differentiation, and mineralization. Conversely, the CTS cement resulted in the highest bacteriostasis ratio among the three hybrid cements against two bacteria. The ROS production followed the order of CTS > QTS > COS at the same 1% concentration. In conclusion, calcium silicate cement with 1% QTS may be a viable candidate for bone defect repair in view of anti-washout performance, setting time, antibacterial activity, and osteogenic activity shown in this study.
    URI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.110727
    https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000527395900099
    https://ir.csmu.edu.tw:8080/handle/310902500/24448
    Relation: MATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING C-MATERIALS FOR BIOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS ,2020 ,v110
    Appears in Collections:[中山醫學大學研究成果] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML244View/Open


    SFX Query

    All items in CSMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback