English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 17933/22952 (78%)
Visitors : 7311149      Online Users : 903
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.csmu.edu.tw:8080/ir/handle/310902500/21735


    Title: Influence of visual impairment and hearing impairment on functional dependence status among people in Taiwan-An evaluation using the WHODAS 2.0 score
    Authors: Ko-Fang Chang;Kwang-Hwa Chang;Wen-Chou Chi;Shih-Wei Huang;Chia-Feng Yen;Hua-Fang Liao;Tsan-Hon Liou;Pin-Zhir Chao;I-Chan Lin
    Keywords: Disability;Functioning;Hearing impairment;International Classification of Functioning (ICF);Visual impairment;WHODAS 2.0.
    Date: 2018-04
    Issue Date: 2021-09-02T03:54:42Z (UTC)
    Publisher: Journal of TheChinese Medical Association
    Abstract: Background:
    Visual impairment (VI) and hearing impairment (HI) are the two most common types of sensory disability encountered clinically. However, VI and HI result in different limitations in daily life. We assessed the level of functioning in patients with VI or HI based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health.

    Methods:
    This nationwide, cross-sectional study included 312 people with VI and 540 people with HI. Each participant's degree of functioning and disability was evaluated using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0). The standardized WHODAS 2.0 scores ranged from 0 (least difficulty) to 100 (most difficulty).

    Results:
    Patients with VI and those with HI had a mean (±standard error) 32-item WHODAS 2.0 score of 42.4 ± 2.9 and 27.1 ± 1.6, respectively. The degree of restriction was positively related to the level of VI. Specifically, the patients with VI and a WHODAS 2.0 score of 33.7–35.3 or higher were likely to experience barriers to accessing mobility products, communication products, and education products. Furthermore, patients with a score of 42.9 or higher might experience barriers to accessing ingestion products and living products.

    Conclusion:
    WHODAS 2.0 scores are strongly correlated with the severity of VI. Mild VI should be targeted for treatment and referral as early as possible. Compared with the patients with HI, the patients with VI more frequently experience barriers to accessing environmental factors.
    URI: https://ir.csmu.edu.tw:8080/handle/310902500/21735
    Relation: Journal of the Chinese Medical Association, Volume 81, Issue 4, p 376-382
    Appears in Collections:[職能治療學系暨碩士班] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    Influence_of_visual_impairment_and_hearing.14.pdf415KbAdobe PDF130View/Open


    SFX Query

    All items in CSMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback