English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 17933/22952 (78%)
Visitors : 7320289      Online Users : 234
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.csmu.edu.tw:8080/ir/handle/310902500/19268


    Title: Refining 3 Measures to Construct an Efficient Functional Assessment of Stroke
    Authors: YL, Wang
    GH, Lin
    YJ, Huang
    MH, Chen
    CL, Hsieh
    Contributors: 中山醫學大學
    Keywords: activities of daily living;motor disorders;postural balance;psychometrics;rehabilitation;stroke
    Date: 2017-06
    Issue Date: 2018-06-22T03:17:24Z (UTC)
    Publisher: Stroke
    ISSN: 0039-2499
    Abstract: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:
    The Fugl-Meyer Assessment motor scale, Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke patients, and Barthel Index are widely used to assess patients' upper extremity and lower extremity motor function, balance, and basic activities of daily living after stroke, respectively. However, these 3 measures (72 items) require a great amount of time for assessment. Therefore, we aimed to develop an efficient test, the Functional Assessment of Stroke (FAS).

    METHODS:
    The FAS was constructed from 4 short-form tests of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-upper extremity, Fugl-Meyer Assessment-lower extremity, Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke patients, and Barthel Index based on the results of Rasch analyses and the items' content. We examined the psychometric properties of the FAS, including Rasch reliability, concurrent validity, convergent validity, known-group validity, and responsiveness.

    RESULTS:
    The FAS contained 29 items (10, 6, 8, and 5 items for the 4 short-form tests, respectively). The FAS demonstrated high Rasch reliability (0.92-0.94), concurrent validity (r=0.90-0.97 with the original tests), convergent validity (r=0.62-0.94 with the 5-scale Fugl-Meyer Assessment), and known-group validity (significant difference in the FAS scores among 3 groups of disability levels; P<0.001). In addition, the responsiveness of the FAS (standardized response mean=0.55-1.93) was similar or significantly superior to those of the original tests (standardized response mean=0.46-1.39).

    CONCLUSIONS:
    The FAS contains 29 items and has sufficient Rasch reliability, validities, and responsiveness. These findings support that the FAS is efficient for reliably and validly assessing upper extremity/lower extremity motor function, balance, and basic activities of daily living and for sensitively detecting change in those functions in patients with stroke.
    URI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015516
    https://ir.csmu.edu.tw:8080/ir/handle/310902500/19268
    Relation: Stroke. 2017 Jun;48(6):1630-1635
    Appears in Collections:[職能治療學系暨碩士班] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML401View/Open


    SFX Query

    All items in CSMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback