|
English
|
正體中文
|
简体中文
|
Items with full text/Total items : 17933/22952 (78%)
Visitors : 7319609
Online Users : 275
|
|
|
Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ir.csmu.edu.tw:8080/ir/handle/310902500/10966
|
Title: | Prophylaxis of ophthalmia neonatorum: comparison of silver nitrate, tetracycline, erythromycin and no prophylaxis. |
Authors: | Chen, JY |
Contributors: | 中山醫學大學 |
Date: | 1992 |
Issue Date: | 2015-06-30T09:16:50Z (UTC)
|
Abstract: | From November, 1989, to October, 1991, 4544 neonates were born at our hospital. Neonatal ocular prophylaxis immediately after birth was used with 1% tetracycline ophthalmic ointment in 1156 neonates, 0.5% erythromycin ophthalmic ointment in 1163 neonates and 1% silver nitrate drops in 1082 neonates. No prophylaxis for neonatal conjunctivitis was given to 1143 neonates. A total of 302 infants (6.7%) developed conjunctivitis during the first 4 weeks of life. Between December, 1991, and January, 1992, 425 neonates were born at our hospital and all were given 0.5% erythromycin ophthalmic ointment twice in the first 24 hours after birth for ocular prophylaxis. Thirty-one (7.3%) infants developed conjunctivitis during the neonatal period. The incidence rates of neonatal chlamydial conjuctivitis in the tetracycline, erythromycin, silver nitrate, no prophylaxis and erythromycin twice groups were 1.3, 1.5, 1.7, 1.6 and 1.4%, respectively. We conclude that neonatal ocular prophylaxis with erythromycin (one or two doses) or tetracycline or silver nitrate does not significantly reduce the incidence of neonatal chlamydial conjunctivitis compared with that in those given no prophylaxis. |
URI: | https://ir.csmu.edu.tw:8080/ir/handle/310902500/10966 |
Relation: | Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1992 Dec;11(12):1026-30. |
Appears in Collections: | [醫學系] 期刊論文
|
Files in This Item:
File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
index.html | 期刊論文 | 0Kb | HTML | 384 | View/Open |
|
All items in CSMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|