English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 17939/22958 (78%)
Visitors : 7380713      Online Users : 242
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.csmu.edu.tw:8080/ir/handle/310902500/10727


    Title: Accuracy and precision evaluation of seven self-monitoring blood glucose systems.
    Authors: Kuo, Chih-Yi
    Hsu, Cheng-Teng
    Ho, Cheng-Shiao
    Su, Ting-En
    Wu, Ming-Hsun
    Wang, Chau-Jong
    Contributors: 中山醫學大學
    Date: 2011
    Issue Date: 2015-05-04T10:43:42Z (UTC)
    ISSN: 1520-9156
    Abstract: Self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) systems play a critical role in management of diabetes. SMBG systems should at least meet the minimal requirement of the World Health Organization's ISO 15197:2003. For tight glycemic control, a tighter accuracy requirement is needed.
    Seven SMBG systems were evaluated for accuracy and precision: Bionime Rightest(™) GM550 (Bionime Corp., Dali City, Taiwan), Accu-Chek(®) Performa (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN), OneTouch(®) Ultra(®)2 (LifeScan Inc., Milpitas, CA), MediSense(®) Optium(™) Xceed (Abbott Diabetes Care Inc., Alameda, CA), Medisafe (TERUMO Corp., Tokyo, Japan), Fora(®) TD4227 (Taidac Technology Corp., Wugu Township, Taiwan), and Ascensia Contour(®) (Bayer HealthCare LLC, Mishawaka, IN). The 107 participants (44 men and 63 women) were between 23 and 91 years old. The analytical results of seven SMBG systems were compared with those of plasma analyzed with the hexokinase method (Olympus AU640, Olympus America Inc., Center Valley, PA).
    The imprecision of the seven blood glucose meters ranged from 1.1% to 4.7%. Three of the seven blood glucose meters (42.9%) fulfilled the minimum accuracy criteria of ISO 15197:2003. The mean absolute relative error value for each blood glucose meter was calculated and ranged from 6.5% to 12.0%.
    More than 40% of evaluated SMBG systems meet the minimal accuracy criteria requirement of ISO 15197:2003. However, considering tighter criteria for accuracy of ±15%, only the Bionime Rightest GM550 meets this requirement. Because SMBG systems play a critical role in management of diabetes, manufacturers have to strive to improve accuracy and precision and to ensure the good quality of blood glucose meters and test strips.

    Accuracy and precision evaluation of seven self-monitoring blood glucose systems. - ResearchGate. Available from: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/50398069_Accuracy_and_precision_evaluation_of_seven_self-monitoring_blood_glucose_systems [accessed May 4, 2015].
    URI: https://ir.csmu.edu.tw:8080/ir/handle/310902500/10727
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2010.0223
    Relation: Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics (Impact Factor: 2.29). 03/2011; 13(5):596-600.
    Appears in Collections:[生化微生物免疫研究所] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html期刊論文0KbHTML686View/Open


    SFX Query

    All items in CSMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback