English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 17933/22952 (78%)
Visitors : 7336348      Online Users : 496
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.csmu.edu.tw:8080/ir/handle/310902500/10439


    Title: Effects of the type and direction of support surface perturbation on postural responses
    Authors: Chiung-Ling Chen
    Shu-Zon Lou
    Hong-Wen Wu
    Shyi-Kuen Wu
    Kwok-Tak Yeung
    Fong-Chin Su
    Contributors: 中山醫學大學
    Keywords: Surface perturbation;Posture;EMG, Center of mass, Kinematics
    Date: 2014-04-07
    Issue Date: 2015-03-11T04:53:34Z (UTC)
    ISSN: 1743-0003
    Abstract: Background
    Postural control is organized around a task goal. The two most frequently used types of tasks for postural control research are translational (translation along the anterior-posterior axis) and rotational (rotation in sagittal plane) surface perturbations. These types of perturbations rotate the ankle joint, causing different magnitudes and directions of body sway. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of the type (translation vs. rotation) and direction (forward/toe up vs. backward/toe down) of the perturbation on postural responses.

    Method
    Nineteen healthy subjects were tested with four perturbations, i.e., forward and backward translation and toe up and toe down rotation. The onset latency and magnitude of muscle activations, angular changes, and COM displacements were measured. In addition, the kinematic data were divided into two phases. The initial phase reflected the balance disturbance induced by the platform movement, and the reversal phase reflected the balance reaction.

    Results
    The results showed that, in the initial phase, rotational perturbation induced earlier ankle movement and faster and larger vertical COM displacement, while translational and forward/toe up perturbations induced larger head and trunk angular change and faster and larger horizontal COM displacement. In the reversal phase, balance reaction was attained by multi-joint movements. Translational and forward/toe up perturbations that induced larger upper body instability evoked faster muscle activation as well as faster and larger hip or knee joint movements.

    Conclusions
    These findings provide insights into an appropriate support surface perturbation for the evaluation and training of balance.
    URI: https://ir.csmu.edu.tw:8080/ir/handle/310902500/10439
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-50
    Relation: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2014, 11:50
    Appears in Collections:[物理治療學系暨碩士班] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML562View/Open


    SFX Query

    All items in CSMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback